Date - Monday, December 14, 2020
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm
Zoom Interactive Webinar
CE Credits: 2
Price: $ 50
See Outline Below.
What Hat(s) Are You Wearing?
Ethical Consequences of Role Confusion in Court-Related Cases:
A ZOOM Interactive Workshop led by Mary Alice Fisher, Ph.D.
What are the implications of our confusion about our different roles in court cases?
Are we participating voluntarily or “involuntarily?” What are the ethical, legal, and clinical impacts?
What are the potential effects on the perceptions of our roles by attorneys, judges, and the public?
Introduction: Are You Clear About Your Role?
I. Possible Roles of Mental Health Professionals in Court-Related Cases
A. Voluntary Roles
B. “Involuntary” Roles
II. Ethical Standards, Guidelines, & Professional Advice about Court-Related Roles
III. Responding Ethically to Legal Demands
A. Responding to “Informal” Legal Demands (§ 8.01-399)
B. Professional Recommendations about Responding to Subpoenas vs. Court Orders
C. Responding to Record Requests in Multi-Client Cases
D. Providing Deposition or Courtroom Testimony
V. Implications of Role Confusion & Role Conflicts
A. Ethical Implications
B. Legal and Risk-Management Considerations
C. Clinical Implications
D. Creating Impressions that Confuse Attorneys, Judges, & the Public
- List some of the possible “voluntary” or “involuntary” roles you might play in a court case.
- Name two possible consequences of role confusion in a court case.
- Explain how you might be able to avoid role confusion.
Register for this Zoom webinar at your convenience. We will use your name and email contact information from your PayPal payment / registration. The day before the Webinar, we will email you a reminder, and a special link for you to use to join the Webinar.
The Center for Ethical Practice
977 Seminole Trail, Charlottesville VA 22901; Tel: 434-971-1841